You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

190 lines
4.6 KiB

Revamp post filtering system (#18058) * Add model for custom filter keywords * Use CustomFilterKeyword internally Does not change the API * Fix /filters/edit and /filters/new * Add migration tests * Remove whole_word column from custom_filters (covered by custom_filter_keywords) * Redesign /filters Instead of a list, present a card that displays more information and handles multiple keywords per filter. * Redesign /filters/new and /filters/edit to add and remove keywords This adds a new gem dependency: cocoon, as well as a npm dependency: cocoon-js-vanilla. Those are used to easily populate and remove form fields from the user interface when manipulating multiple keyword filters at once. * Add /api/v2/filters to edit filter with multiple keywords Entities: - `Filter`: `id`, `title`, `filter_action` (either `hide` or `warn`), `context` `keywords` - `FilterKeyword`: `id`, `keyword`, `whole_word` API endpoits: - `GET /api/v2/filters` to list filters (including keywords) - `POST /api/v2/filters` to create a new filter `keywords_attributes` can also be passed to create keywords in one request - `GET /api/v2/filters/:id` to read a particular filter - `PUT /api/v2/filters/:id` to update a new filter `keywords_attributes` can also be passed to edit, delete or add keywords in one request - `DELETE /api/v2/filters/:id` to delete a particular filter - `GET /api/v2/filters/:id/keywords` to list keywords for a filter - `POST /api/v2/filters/:filter_id/keywords/:id` to add a new keyword to a filter - `GET /api/v2/filter_keywords/:id` to read a particular keyword - `PUT /api/v2/filter_keywords/:id` to edit a particular keyword - `DELETE /api/v2/filter_keywords/:id` to delete a particular keyword * Change from `irreversible` boolean to `action` enum * Remove irrelevent `irreversible_must_be_within_context` check * Fix /filters/new and /filters/edit with update for filter_action * Fix Rubocop/Codeclimate complaining about task names * Refactor FeedManager#phrase_filtered? This moves regexp building and filter caching to the `CustomFilter` class. This does not change the functional behavior yet, but this changes how the cache is built, doing per-custom_filter regexps so that filters can be matched independently, while still offering caching. * Perform server-side filtering and output result in REST API * Fix numerous filters_changed events being sent when editing multiple keywords at once * Add some tests * Use the new API in the WebUI - use client-side logic for filters we have fetched rules for. This is so that filter changes can be retroactively applied without reloading the UI. - use server-side logic for filters we haven't fetched rules for yet (e.g. network error, or initial timeline loading) * Minor optimizations and refactoring * Perform server-side filtering on the streaming server * Change the wording of filter action labels * Fix issues pointed out by linter * Change design of “Show anyway” link in accordence to review comments * Drop “irreversible” filtering behavior * Move /api/v2/filter_keywords to /api/v1/filters/keywords * Rename `filter_results` attribute to `filtered` * Rename REST::LegacyFilterSerializer to REST::V1::FilterSerializer * Fix systemChannelId value in streaming server * Simplify code by removing client-side filtering code The simplifcation comes at a cost though: filters aren't retroactively applied anymore.
1 year ago
Change IDs to strings rather than numbers in API JSON output (#5019) * Fix JavaScript interface with long IDs Somewhat predictably, the JS interface handled IDs as numbers, which in JS are IEEE double-precision floats. This loses some precision when working with numbers as large as those generated by the new ID scheme, so we instead handle them here as strings. This is relatively simple, and doesn't appear to have caused any problems, but should definitely be tested more thoroughly than the built-in tests. Several days of use appear to support this working properly. BREAKING CHANGE: The major(!) change here is that IDs are now returned as strings by the REST endpoints, rather than as integers. In practice, relatively few changes were required to make the existing JS UI work with this change, but it will likely hit API clients pretty hard: it's an entirely different type to consume. (The one API client I tested, Tusky, handles this with no problems, however.) Twitter ran into this issue when introducing Snowflake IDs, and decided to instead introduce an `id_str` field in JSON responses. I have opted to *not* do that, and instead force all IDs to 64-bit integers represented by strings in one go. (I believe Twitter exacerbated their problem by rolling out the changes three times: once for statuses, once for DMs, and once for user IDs, as well as by leaving an integer ID value in JSON. As they said, "If you’re using the `id` field with JSON in a Javascript-related language, there is a very high likelihood that the integers will be silently munged by Javascript interpreters. In most cases, this will result in behavior such as being unable to load or delete a specific direct message, because the ID you're sending to the API is different than the actual identifier associated with the message." [1]) However, given that this is a significant change for API users, alternatives or a transition time may be appropriate. 1: https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/a/2011/direct-messages-going-snowflake-on-sep-30-2011.html * Additional fixes for stringified IDs in JSON These should be the last two. These were identified using eslint to try to identify any plain casts to JavaScript numbers. (Some such casts are legitimate, but these were not.) Adding the following to .eslintrc.yml will identify casts to numbers: ~~~ no-restricted-syntax: - warn - selector: UnaryExpression[operator='+'] > :not(Literal) message: Avoid the use of unary + - selector: CallExpression[callee.name='Number'] message: Casting with Number() may coerce string IDs to numbers ~~~ The remaining three casts appear legitimate: two casts to array indices, one in a server to turn an environment variable into a number. * Back out RelationshipsController Change This was made to make a test a bit less flakey, but has nothing to do with this branch. * Change internal streaming payloads to stringified IDs as well Per https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/pull/5019#issuecomment-330736452 we need these changes to send deleted status IDs as strings, not integers.
6 years ago
Change IDs to strings rather than numbers in API JSON output (#5019) * Fix JavaScript interface with long IDs Somewhat predictably, the JS interface handled IDs as numbers, which in JS are IEEE double-precision floats. This loses some precision when working with numbers as large as those generated by the new ID scheme, so we instead handle them here as strings. This is relatively simple, and doesn't appear to have caused any problems, but should definitely be tested more thoroughly than the built-in tests. Several days of use appear to support this working properly. BREAKING CHANGE: The major(!) change here is that IDs are now returned as strings by the REST endpoints, rather than as integers. In practice, relatively few changes were required to make the existing JS UI work with this change, but it will likely hit API clients pretty hard: it's an entirely different type to consume. (The one API client I tested, Tusky, handles this with no problems, however.) Twitter ran into this issue when introducing Snowflake IDs, and decided to instead introduce an `id_str` field in JSON responses. I have opted to *not* do that, and instead force all IDs to 64-bit integers represented by strings in one go. (I believe Twitter exacerbated their problem by rolling out the changes three times: once for statuses, once for DMs, and once for user IDs, as well as by leaving an integer ID value in JSON. As they said, "If you’re using the `id` field with JSON in a Javascript-related language, there is a very high likelihood that the integers will be silently munged by Javascript interpreters. In most cases, this will result in behavior such as being unable to load or delete a specific direct message, because the ID you're sending to the API is different than the actual identifier associated with the message." [1]) However, given that this is a significant change for API users, alternatives or a transition time may be appropriate. 1: https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/a/2011/direct-messages-going-snowflake-on-sep-30-2011.html * Additional fixes for stringified IDs in JSON These should be the last two. These were identified using eslint to try to identify any plain casts to JavaScript numbers. (Some such casts are legitimate, but these were not.) Adding the following to .eslintrc.yml will identify casts to numbers: ~~~ no-restricted-syntax: - warn - selector: UnaryExpression[operator='+'] > :not(Literal) message: Avoid the use of unary + - selector: CallExpression[callee.name='Number'] message: Casting with Number() may coerce string IDs to numbers ~~~ The remaining three casts appear legitimate: two casts to array indices, one in a server to turn an environment variable into a number. * Back out RelationshipsController Change This was made to make a test a bit less flakey, but has nothing to do with this branch. * Change internal streaming payloads to stringified IDs as well Per https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/pull/5019#issuecomment-330736452 we need these changes to send deleted status IDs as strings, not integers.
6 years ago
Change IDs to strings rather than numbers in API JSON output (#5019) * Fix JavaScript interface with long IDs Somewhat predictably, the JS interface handled IDs as numbers, which in JS are IEEE double-precision floats. This loses some precision when working with numbers as large as those generated by the new ID scheme, so we instead handle them here as strings. This is relatively simple, and doesn't appear to have caused any problems, but should definitely be tested more thoroughly than the built-in tests. Several days of use appear to support this working properly. BREAKING CHANGE: The major(!) change here is that IDs are now returned as strings by the REST endpoints, rather than as integers. In practice, relatively few changes were required to make the existing JS UI work with this change, but it will likely hit API clients pretty hard: it's an entirely different type to consume. (The one API client I tested, Tusky, handles this with no problems, however.) Twitter ran into this issue when introducing Snowflake IDs, and decided to instead introduce an `id_str` field in JSON responses. I have opted to *not* do that, and instead force all IDs to 64-bit integers represented by strings in one go. (I believe Twitter exacerbated their problem by rolling out the changes three times: once for statuses, once for DMs, and once for user IDs, as well as by leaving an integer ID value in JSON. As they said, "If you’re using the `id` field with JSON in a Javascript-related language, there is a very high likelihood that the integers will be silently munged by Javascript interpreters. In most cases, this will result in behavior such as being unable to load or delete a specific direct message, because the ID you're sending to the API is different than the actual identifier associated with the message." [1]) However, given that this is a significant change for API users, alternatives or a transition time may be appropriate. 1: https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/a/2011/direct-messages-going-snowflake-on-sep-30-2011.html * Additional fixes for stringified IDs in JSON These should be the last two. These were identified using eslint to try to identify any plain casts to JavaScript numbers. (Some such casts are legitimate, but these were not.) Adding the following to .eslintrc.yml will identify casts to numbers: ~~~ no-restricted-syntax: - warn - selector: UnaryExpression[operator='+'] > :not(Literal) message: Avoid the use of unary + - selector: CallExpression[callee.name='Number'] message: Casting with Number() may coerce string IDs to numbers ~~~ The remaining three casts appear legitimate: two casts to array indices, one in a server to turn an environment variable into a number. * Back out RelationshipsController Change This was made to make a test a bit less flakey, but has nothing to do with this branch. * Change internal streaming payloads to stringified IDs as well Per https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/pull/5019#issuecomment-330736452 we need these changes to send deleted status IDs as strings, not integers.
6 years ago
Revamp post filtering system (#18058) * Add model for custom filter keywords * Use CustomFilterKeyword internally Does not change the API * Fix /filters/edit and /filters/new * Add migration tests * Remove whole_word column from custom_filters (covered by custom_filter_keywords) * Redesign /filters Instead of a list, present a card that displays more information and handles multiple keywords per filter. * Redesign /filters/new and /filters/edit to add and remove keywords This adds a new gem dependency: cocoon, as well as a npm dependency: cocoon-js-vanilla. Those are used to easily populate and remove form fields from the user interface when manipulating multiple keyword filters at once. * Add /api/v2/filters to edit filter with multiple keywords Entities: - `Filter`: `id`, `title`, `filter_action` (either `hide` or `warn`), `context` `keywords` - `FilterKeyword`: `id`, `keyword`, `whole_word` API endpoits: - `GET /api/v2/filters` to list filters (including keywords) - `POST /api/v2/filters` to create a new filter `keywords_attributes` can also be passed to create keywords in one request - `GET /api/v2/filters/:id` to read a particular filter - `PUT /api/v2/filters/:id` to update a new filter `keywords_attributes` can also be passed to edit, delete or add keywords in one request - `DELETE /api/v2/filters/:id` to delete a particular filter - `GET /api/v2/filters/:id/keywords` to list keywords for a filter - `POST /api/v2/filters/:filter_id/keywords/:id` to add a new keyword to a filter - `GET /api/v2/filter_keywords/:id` to read a particular keyword - `PUT /api/v2/filter_keywords/:id` to edit a particular keyword - `DELETE /api/v2/filter_keywords/:id` to delete a particular keyword * Change from `irreversible` boolean to `action` enum * Remove irrelevent `irreversible_must_be_within_context` check * Fix /filters/new and /filters/edit with update for filter_action * Fix Rubocop/Codeclimate complaining about task names * Refactor FeedManager#phrase_filtered? This moves regexp building and filter caching to the `CustomFilter` class. This does not change the functional behavior yet, but this changes how the cache is built, doing per-custom_filter regexps so that filters can be matched independently, while still offering caching. * Perform server-side filtering and output result in REST API * Fix numerous filters_changed events being sent when editing multiple keywords at once * Add some tests * Use the new API in the WebUI - use client-side logic for filters we have fetched rules for. This is so that filter changes can be retroactively applied without reloading the UI. - use server-side logic for filters we haven't fetched rules for yet (e.g. network error, or initial timeline loading) * Minor optimizations and refactoring * Perform server-side filtering on the streaming server * Change the wording of filter action labels * Fix issues pointed out by linter * Change design of “Show anyway” link in accordence to review comments * Drop “irreversible” filtering behavior * Move /api/v2/filter_keywords to /api/v1/filters/keywords * Rename `filter_results` attribute to `filtered` * Rename REST::LegacyFilterSerializer to REST::V1::FilterSerializer * Fix systemChannelId value in streaming server * Simplify code by removing client-side filtering code The simplifcation comes at a cost though: filters aren't retroactively applied anymore.
1 year ago
Change IDs to strings rather than numbers in API JSON output (#5019) * Fix JavaScript interface with long IDs Somewhat predictably, the JS interface handled IDs as numbers, which in JS are IEEE double-precision floats. This loses some precision when working with numbers as large as those generated by the new ID scheme, so we instead handle them here as strings. This is relatively simple, and doesn't appear to have caused any problems, but should definitely be tested more thoroughly than the built-in tests. Several days of use appear to support this working properly. BREAKING CHANGE: The major(!) change here is that IDs are now returned as strings by the REST endpoints, rather than as integers. In practice, relatively few changes were required to make the existing JS UI work with this change, but it will likely hit API clients pretty hard: it's an entirely different type to consume. (The one API client I tested, Tusky, handles this with no problems, however.) Twitter ran into this issue when introducing Snowflake IDs, and decided to instead introduce an `id_str` field in JSON responses. I have opted to *not* do that, and instead force all IDs to 64-bit integers represented by strings in one go. (I believe Twitter exacerbated their problem by rolling out the changes three times: once for statuses, once for DMs, and once for user IDs, as well as by leaving an integer ID value in JSON. As they said, "If you’re using the `id` field with JSON in a Javascript-related language, there is a very high likelihood that the integers will be silently munged by Javascript interpreters. In most cases, this will result in behavior such as being unable to load or delete a specific direct message, because the ID you're sending to the API is different than the actual identifier associated with the message." [1]) However, given that this is a significant change for API users, alternatives or a transition time may be appropriate. 1: https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/a/2011/direct-messages-going-snowflake-on-sep-30-2011.html * Additional fixes for stringified IDs in JSON These should be the last two. These were identified using eslint to try to identify any plain casts to JavaScript numbers. (Some such casts are legitimate, but these were not.) Adding the following to .eslintrc.yml will identify casts to numbers: ~~~ no-restricted-syntax: - warn - selector: UnaryExpression[operator='+'] > :not(Literal) message: Avoid the use of unary + - selector: CallExpression[callee.name='Number'] message: Casting with Number() may coerce string IDs to numbers ~~~ The remaining three casts appear legitimate: two casts to array indices, one in a server to turn an environment variable into a number. * Back out RelationshipsController Change This was made to make a test a bit less flakey, but has nothing to do with this branch. * Change internal streaming payloads to stringified IDs as well Per https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/pull/5019#issuecomment-330736452 we need these changes to send deleted status IDs as strings, not integers.
6 years ago
  1. # frozen_string_literal: true
  2. class REST::StatusSerializer < ActiveModel::Serializer
  3. include FormattingHelper
  4. attributes :id, :created_at, :in_reply_to_id, :in_reply_to_account_id,
  5. :sensitive, :spoiler_text, :visibility, :language, :translatable,
  6. :uri, :url, :replies_count, :reblogs_count,
  7. :favourites_count, :edited_at
  8. attribute :favourited, if: :current_user?
  9. attribute :reblogged, if: :current_user?
  10. attribute :muted, if: :current_user?
  11. attribute :bookmarked, if: :current_user?
  12. attribute :pinned, if: :pinnable?
  13. attribute :local_only if :local?
  14. has_many :filtered, serializer: REST::FilterResultSerializer, if: :current_user?
  15. attribute :content, unless: :source_requested?
  16. attribute :text, if: :source_requested?
  17. attribute :content_type, if: :source_requested?
  18. belongs_to :reblog, serializer: REST::StatusSerializer
  19. belongs_to :application, if: :show_application?
  20. belongs_to :account, serializer: REST::AccountSerializer
  21. has_many :ordered_media_attachments, key: :media_attachments, serializer: REST::MediaAttachmentSerializer
  22. has_many :ordered_mentions, key: :mentions
  23. has_many :tags
  24. has_many :emojis, serializer: REST::CustomEmojiSerializer
  25. has_one :preview_card, key: :card, serializer: REST::PreviewCardSerializer
  26. has_one :preloadable_poll, key: :poll, serializer: REST::PollSerializer
  27. def id
  28. object.id.to_s
  29. end
  30. def in_reply_to_id
  31. object.in_reply_to_id&.to_s
  32. end
  33. def in_reply_to_account_id
  34. object.in_reply_to_account_id&.to_s
  35. end
  36. def current_user?
  37. !current_user.nil?
  38. end
  39. def show_application?
  40. object.account.user_shows_application? || (current_user? && current_user.account_id == object.account_id)
  41. end
  42. def translatable
  43. current_user? && object.translatable?
  44. end
  45. def visibility
  46. # This visibility is masked behind "private"
  47. # to avoid API changes because there are no
  48. # UX differences
  49. if object.limited_visibility?
  50. 'private'
  51. else
  52. object.visibility
  53. end
  54. end
  55. def sensitive
  56. if current_user? && current_user.account_id == object.account_id
  57. object.sensitive
  58. else
  59. object.account.sensitized? || object.sensitive
  60. end
  61. end
  62. def uri
  63. ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.uri_for(object)
  64. end
  65. def content
  66. status_content_format(object)
  67. end
  68. def url
  69. ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.url_for(object)
  70. end
  71. def favourited
  72. if instance_options && instance_options[:relationships]
  73. instance_options[:relationships].favourites_map[object.id] || false
  74. else
  75. current_user.account.favourited?(object)
  76. end
  77. end
  78. def reblogged
  79. if instance_options && instance_options[:relationships]
  80. instance_options[:relationships].reblogs_map[object.id] || false
  81. else
  82. current_user.account.reblogged?(object)
  83. end
  84. end
  85. def muted
  86. if instance_options && instance_options[:relationships]
  87. instance_options[:relationships].mutes_map[object.conversation_id] || false
  88. else
  89. current_user.account.muting_conversation?(object.conversation)
  90. end
  91. end
  92. def bookmarked
  93. if instance_options && instance_options[:relationships]
  94. instance_options[:relationships].bookmarks_map[object.id] || false
  95. else
  96. current_user.account.bookmarked?(object)
  97. end
  98. end
  99. def pinned
  100. if instance_options && instance_options[:relationships]
  101. instance_options[:relationships].pins_map[object.id] || false
  102. else
  103. current_user.account.pinned?(object)
  104. end
  105. end
  106. def filtered
  107. if instance_options && instance_options[:relationships]
  108. instance_options[:relationships].filters_map[object.id] || []
  109. else
  110. current_user.account.status_matches_filters(object)
  111. end
  112. end
  113. def pinnable?
  114. current_user? &&
  115. current_user.account_id == object.account_id &&
  116. !object.reblog? &&
  117. %w(public unlisted private).include?(object.visibility)
  118. end
  119. def source_requested?
  120. instance_options[:source_requested]
  121. end
  122. def ordered_mentions
  123. object.active_mentions.to_a.sort_by(&:id)
  124. end
  125. class ApplicationSerializer < ActiveModel::Serializer
  126. attributes :name, :website
  127. def website
  128. object.website.presence
  129. end
  130. end
  131. class MentionSerializer < ActiveModel::Serializer
  132. attributes :id, :username, :url, :acct
  133. def id
  134. object.account_id.to_s
  135. end
  136. def username
  137. object.account_username
  138. end
  139. def url
  140. ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.url_for(object.account)
  141. end
  142. def acct
  143. object.account.pretty_acct
  144. end
  145. end
  146. class TagSerializer < ActiveModel::Serializer
  147. include RoutingHelper
  148. attributes :name, :url
  149. def url
  150. tag_url(object)
  151. end
  152. end
  153. end