You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

693 lines
17 KiB

Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
6 years ago
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
6 years ago
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
6 years ago
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
6 years ago
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
6 years ago
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
6 years ago
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
6 years ago
  1. import api, { getLinks } from '../api';
  2. import asyncDB from '../storage/db';
  3. import { importAccount, importFetchedAccount, importFetchedAccounts } from './importer';
  4. export const ACCOUNT_FETCH_REQUEST = 'ACCOUNT_FETCH_REQUEST';
  5. export const ACCOUNT_FETCH_SUCCESS = 'ACCOUNT_FETCH_SUCCESS';
  6. export const ACCOUNT_FETCH_FAIL = 'ACCOUNT_FETCH_FAIL';
  7. export const ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_REQUEST = 'ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_REQUEST';
  8. export const ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_SUCCESS = 'ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_SUCCESS';
  9. export const ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_FAIL = 'ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_FAIL';
  10. export const ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_REQUEST = 'ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_REQUEST';
  11. export const ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_SUCCESS = 'ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_SUCCESS';
  12. export const ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_FAIL = 'ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_FAIL';
  13. export const ACCOUNT_BLOCK_REQUEST = 'ACCOUNT_BLOCK_REQUEST';
  14. export const ACCOUNT_BLOCK_SUCCESS = 'ACCOUNT_BLOCK_SUCCESS';
  15. export const ACCOUNT_BLOCK_FAIL = 'ACCOUNT_BLOCK_FAIL';
  16. export const ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_REQUEST = 'ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_REQUEST';
  17. export const ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_SUCCESS = 'ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_SUCCESS';
  18. export const ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_FAIL = 'ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_FAIL';
  19. export const ACCOUNT_MUTE_REQUEST = 'ACCOUNT_MUTE_REQUEST';
  20. export const ACCOUNT_MUTE_SUCCESS = 'ACCOUNT_MUTE_SUCCESS';
  21. export const ACCOUNT_MUTE_FAIL = 'ACCOUNT_MUTE_FAIL';
  22. export const ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_REQUEST = 'ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_REQUEST';
  23. export const ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_SUCCESS = 'ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_SUCCESS';
  24. export const ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_FAIL = 'ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_FAIL';
  25. export const FOLLOWERS_FETCH_REQUEST = 'FOLLOWERS_FETCH_REQUEST';
  26. export const FOLLOWERS_FETCH_SUCCESS = 'FOLLOWERS_FETCH_SUCCESS';
  27. export const FOLLOWERS_FETCH_FAIL = 'FOLLOWERS_FETCH_FAIL';
  28. export const FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_REQUEST = 'FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_REQUEST';
  29. export const FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_SUCCESS = 'FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_SUCCESS';
  30. export const FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_FAIL = 'FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_FAIL';
  31. export const FOLLOWING_FETCH_REQUEST = 'FOLLOWING_FETCH_REQUEST';
  32. export const FOLLOWING_FETCH_SUCCESS = 'FOLLOWING_FETCH_SUCCESS';
  33. export const FOLLOWING_FETCH_FAIL = 'FOLLOWING_FETCH_FAIL';
  34. export const FOLLOWING_EXPAND_REQUEST = 'FOLLOWING_EXPAND_REQUEST';
  35. export const FOLLOWING_EXPAND_SUCCESS = 'FOLLOWING_EXPAND_SUCCESS';
  36. export const FOLLOWING_EXPAND_FAIL = 'FOLLOWING_EXPAND_FAIL';
  37. export const RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_REQUEST = 'RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_REQUEST';
  38. export const RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_SUCCESS = 'RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_SUCCESS';
  39. export const RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_FAIL = 'RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_FAIL';
  40. export const FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_REQUEST = 'FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_REQUEST';
  41. export const FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_SUCCESS = 'FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_SUCCESS';
  42. export const FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_FAIL = 'FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_FAIL';
  43. export const FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_REQUEST = 'FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_REQUEST';
  44. export const FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_SUCCESS = 'FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_SUCCESS';
  45. export const FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_FAIL = 'FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_FAIL';
  46. export const FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_REQUEST = 'FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_REQUEST';
  47. export const FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_SUCCESS = 'FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_SUCCESS';
  48. export const FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_FAIL = 'FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_FAIL';
  49. export const FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_REQUEST = 'FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_REQUEST';
  50. export const FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_SUCCESS = 'FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_SUCCESS';
  51. export const FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_FAIL = 'FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_FAIL';
  52. function getFromDB(dispatch, getState, index, id) {
  53. return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
  54. const request = index.get(id);
  55. request.onerror = reject;
  56. request.onsuccess = () => {
  57. if (!request.result) {
  58. reject();
  59. return;
  60. }
  61. dispatch(importAccount(request.result));
  62. resolve(request.result.moved && getFromDB(dispatch, getState, index, request.result.moved));
  63. };
  64. });
  65. }
  66. export function fetchAccount(id) {
  67. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  68. dispatch(fetchRelationships([id]));
  69. if (getState().getIn(['accounts', id], null) !== null) {
  70. return;
  71. }
  72. dispatch(fetchAccountRequest(id));
  73. asyncDB.then(db => getFromDB(
  74. dispatch,
  75. getState,
  76. db.transaction('accounts', 'read').objectStore('accounts').index('id'),
  77. id
  78. )).catch(() => api(getState).get(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}`).then(response => {
  79. dispatch(importFetchedAccount(response.data));
  80. })).then(() => {
  81. dispatch(fetchAccountSuccess());
  82. }, error => {
  83. dispatch(fetchAccountFail(id, error));
  84. });
  85. };
  86. };
  87. export function fetchAccountRequest(id) {
  88. return {
  89. type: ACCOUNT_FETCH_REQUEST,
  90. id,
  91. };
  92. };
  93. export function fetchAccountSuccess() {
  94. return {
  95. type: ACCOUNT_FETCH_SUCCESS,
  96. };
  97. };
  98. export function fetchAccountFail(id, error) {
  99. return {
  100. type: ACCOUNT_FETCH_FAIL,
  101. id,
  102. error,
  103. skipAlert: true,
  104. };
  105. };
  106. export function followAccount(id, reblogs = true) {
  107. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  108. const alreadyFollowing = getState().getIn(['relationships', id, 'following']);
  109. dispatch(followAccountRequest(id));
  110. api(getState).post(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}/follow`, { reblogs }).then(response => {
  111. dispatch(followAccountSuccess(response.data, alreadyFollowing));
  112. }).catch(error => {
  113. dispatch(followAccountFail(error));
  114. });
  115. };
  116. };
  117. export function unfollowAccount(id) {
  118. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  119. dispatch(unfollowAccountRequest(id));
  120. api(getState).post(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}/unfollow`).then(response => {
  121. dispatch(unfollowAccountSuccess(response.data, getState().get('statuses')));
  122. }).catch(error => {
  123. dispatch(unfollowAccountFail(error));
  124. });
  125. };
  126. };
  127. export function followAccountRequest(id) {
  128. return {
  129. type: ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_REQUEST,
  130. id,
  131. };
  132. };
  133. export function followAccountSuccess(relationship, alreadyFollowing) {
  134. return {
  135. type: ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_SUCCESS,
  136. relationship,
  137. alreadyFollowing,
  138. };
  139. };
  140. export function followAccountFail(error) {
  141. return {
  142. type: ACCOUNT_FOLLOW_FAIL,
  143. error,
  144. };
  145. };
  146. export function unfollowAccountRequest(id) {
  147. return {
  148. type: ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_REQUEST,
  149. id,
  150. };
  151. };
  152. export function unfollowAccountSuccess(relationship, statuses) {
  153. return {
  154. type: ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_SUCCESS,
  155. relationship,
  156. statuses,
  157. };
  158. };
  159. export function unfollowAccountFail(error) {
  160. return {
  161. type: ACCOUNT_UNFOLLOW_FAIL,
  162. error,
  163. };
  164. };
  165. export function blockAccount(id) {
  166. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  167. dispatch(blockAccountRequest(id));
  168. api(getState).post(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}/block`).then(response => {
  169. // Pass in entire statuses map so we can use it to filter stuff in different parts of the reducers
  170. dispatch(blockAccountSuccess(response.data, getState().get('statuses')));
  171. }).catch(error => {
  172. dispatch(blockAccountFail(id, error));
  173. });
  174. };
  175. };
  176. export function unblockAccount(id) {
  177. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  178. dispatch(unblockAccountRequest(id));
  179. api(getState).post(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}/unblock`).then(response => {
  180. dispatch(unblockAccountSuccess(response.data));
  181. }).catch(error => {
  182. dispatch(unblockAccountFail(id, error));
  183. });
  184. };
  185. };
  186. export function blockAccountRequest(id) {
  187. return {
  188. type: ACCOUNT_BLOCK_REQUEST,
  189. id,
  190. };
  191. };
  192. export function blockAccountSuccess(relationship, statuses) {
  193. return {
  194. type: ACCOUNT_BLOCK_SUCCESS,
  195. relationship,
  196. statuses,
  197. };
  198. };
  199. export function blockAccountFail(error) {
  200. return {
  201. type: ACCOUNT_BLOCK_FAIL,
  202. error,
  203. };
  204. };
  205. export function unblockAccountRequest(id) {
  206. return {
  207. type: ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_REQUEST,
  208. id,
  209. };
  210. };
  211. export function unblockAccountSuccess(relationship) {
  212. return {
  213. type: ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_SUCCESS,
  214. relationship,
  215. };
  216. };
  217. export function unblockAccountFail(error) {
  218. return {
  219. type: ACCOUNT_UNBLOCK_FAIL,
  220. error,
  221. };
  222. };
  223. export function muteAccount(id, notifications) {
  224. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  225. dispatch(muteAccountRequest(id));
  226. api(getState).post(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}/mute`, { notifications }).then(response => {
  227. // Pass in entire statuses map so we can use it to filter stuff in different parts of the reducers
  228. dispatch(muteAccountSuccess(response.data, getState().get('statuses')));
  229. }).catch(error => {
  230. dispatch(muteAccountFail(id, error));
  231. });
  232. };
  233. };
  234. export function unmuteAccount(id) {
  235. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  236. dispatch(unmuteAccountRequest(id));
  237. api(getState).post(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}/unmute`).then(response => {
  238. dispatch(unmuteAccountSuccess(response.data));
  239. }).catch(error => {
  240. dispatch(unmuteAccountFail(id, error));
  241. });
  242. };
  243. };
  244. export function muteAccountRequest(id) {
  245. return {
  246. type: ACCOUNT_MUTE_REQUEST,
  247. id,
  248. };
  249. };
  250. export function muteAccountSuccess(relationship, statuses) {
  251. return {
  252. type: ACCOUNT_MUTE_SUCCESS,
  253. relationship,
  254. statuses,
  255. };
  256. };
  257. export function muteAccountFail(error) {
  258. return {
  259. type: ACCOUNT_MUTE_FAIL,
  260. error,
  261. };
  262. };
  263. export function unmuteAccountRequest(id) {
  264. return {
  265. type: ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_REQUEST,
  266. id,
  267. };
  268. };
  269. export function unmuteAccountSuccess(relationship) {
  270. return {
  271. type: ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_SUCCESS,
  272. relationship,
  273. };
  274. };
  275. export function unmuteAccountFail(error) {
  276. return {
  277. type: ACCOUNT_UNMUTE_FAIL,
  278. error,
  279. };
  280. };
  281. export function fetchFollowers(id) {
  282. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  283. dispatch(fetchFollowersRequest(id));
  284. api(getState).get(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}/followers`).then(response => {
  285. const next = getLinks(response).refs.find(link => link.rel === 'next');
  286. dispatch(importFetchedAccounts(response.data));
  287. dispatch(fetchFollowersSuccess(id, response.data, next ? next.uri : null));
  288. dispatch(fetchRelationships(response.data.map(item => item.id)));
  289. }).catch(error => {
  290. dispatch(fetchFollowersFail(id, error));
  291. });
  292. };
  293. };
  294. export function fetchFollowersRequest(id) {
  295. return {
  296. type: FOLLOWERS_FETCH_REQUEST,
  297. id,
  298. };
  299. };
  300. export function fetchFollowersSuccess(id, accounts, next) {
  301. return {
  302. type: FOLLOWERS_FETCH_SUCCESS,
  303. id,
  304. accounts,
  305. next,
  306. };
  307. };
  308. export function fetchFollowersFail(id, error) {
  309. return {
  310. type: FOLLOWERS_FETCH_FAIL,
  311. id,
  312. error,
  313. };
  314. };
  315. export function expandFollowers(id) {
  316. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  317. const url = getState().getIn(['user_lists', 'followers', id, 'next']);
  318. if (url === null) {
  319. return;
  320. }
  321. dispatch(expandFollowersRequest(id));
  322. api(getState).get(url).then(response => {
  323. const next = getLinks(response).refs.find(link => link.rel === 'next');
  324. dispatch(importFetchedAccounts(response.data));
  325. dispatch(expandFollowersSuccess(id, response.data, next ? next.uri : null));
  326. dispatch(fetchRelationships(response.data.map(item => item.id)));
  327. }).catch(error => {
  328. dispatch(expandFollowersFail(id, error));
  329. });
  330. };
  331. };
  332. export function expandFollowersRequest(id) {
  333. return {
  334. type: FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_REQUEST,
  335. id,
  336. };
  337. };
  338. export function expandFollowersSuccess(id, accounts, next) {
  339. return {
  340. type: FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_SUCCESS,
  341. id,
  342. accounts,
  343. next,
  344. };
  345. };
  346. export function expandFollowersFail(id, error) {
  347. return {
  348. type: FOLLOWERS_EXPAND_FAIL,
  349. id,
  350. error,
  351. };
  352. };
  353. export function fetchFollowing(id) {
  354. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  355. dispatch(fetchFollowingRequest(id));
  356. api(getState).get(`/api/v1/accounts/${id}/following`).then(response => {
  357. const next = getLinks(response).refs.find(link => link.rel === 'next');
  358. dispatch(importFetchedAccounts(response.data));
  359. dispatch(fetchFollowingSuccess(id, response.data, next ? next.uri : null));
  360. dispatch(fetchRelationships(response.data.map(item => item.id)));
  361. }).catch(error => {
  362. dispatch(fetchFollowingFail(id, error));
  363. });
  364. };
  365. };
  366. export function fetchFollowingRequest(id) {
  367. return {
  368. type: FOLLOWING_FETCH_REQUEST,
  369. id,
  370. };
  371. };
  372. export function fetchFollowingSuccess(id, accounts, next) {
  373. return {
  374. type: FOLLOWING_FETCH_SUCCESS,
  375. id,
  376. accounts,
  377. next,
  378. };
  379. };
  380. export function fetchFollowingFail(id, error) {
  381. return {
  382. type: FOLLOWING_FETCH_FAIL,
  383. id,
  384. error,
  385. };
  386. };
  387. export function expandFollowing(id) {
  388. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  389. const url = getState().getIn(['user_lists', 'following', id, 'next']);
  390. if (url === null) {
  391. return;
  392. }
  393. dispatch(expandFollowingRequest(id));
  394. api(getState).get(url).then(response => {
  395. const next = getLinks(response).refs.find(link => link.rel === 'next');
  396. dispatch(importFetchedAccounts(response.data));
  397. dispatch(expandFollowingSuccess(id, response.data, next ? next.uri : null));
  398. dispatch(fetchRelationships(response.data.map(item => item.id)));
  399. }).catch(error => {
  400. dispatch(expandFollowingFail(id, error));
  401. });
  402. };
  403. };
  404. export function expandFollowingRequest(id) {
  405. return {
  406. type: FOLLOWING_EXPAND_REQUEST,
  407. id,
  408. };
  409. };
  410. export function expandFollowingSuccess(id, accounts, next) {
  411. return {
  412. type: FOLLOWING_EXPAND_SUCCESS,
  413. id,
  414. accounts,
  415. next,
  416. };
  417. };
  418. export function expandFollowingFail(id, error) {
  419. return {
  420. type: FOLLOWING_EXPAND_FAIL,
  421. id,
  422. error,
  423. };
  424. };
  425. export function fetchRelationships(accountIds) {
  426. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  427. const loadedRelationships = getState().get('relationships');
  428. const newAccountIds = accountIds.filter(id => loadedRelationships.get(id, null) === null);
  429. if (newAccountIds.length === 0) {
  430. return;
  431. }
  432. dispatch(fetchRelationshipsRequest(newAccountIds));
  433. api(getState).get(`/api/v1/accounts/relationships?${newAccountIds.map(id => `id[]=${id}`).join('&')}`).then(response => {
  434. dispatch(fetchRelationshipsSuccess(response.data));
  435. }).catch(error => {
  436. dispatch(fetchRelationshipsFail(error));
  437. });
  438. };
  439. };
  440. export function fetchRelationshipsRequest(ids) {
  441. return {
  442. type: RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_REQUEST,
  443. ids,
  444. skipLoading: true,
  445. };
  446. };
  447. export function fetchRelationshipsSuccess(relationships) {
  448. return {
  449. type: RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_SUCCESS,
  450. relationships,
  451. skipLoading: true,
  452. };
  453. };
  454. export function fetchRelationshipsFail(error) {
  455. return {
  456. type: RELATIONSHIPS_FETCH_FAIL,
  457. error,
  458. skipLoading: true,
  459. };
  460. };
  461. export function fetchFollowRequests() {
  462. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  463. dispatch(fetchFollowRequestsRequest());
  464. api(getState).get('/api/v1/follow_requests').then(response => {
  465. const next = getLinks(response).refs.find(link => link.rel === 'next');
  466. dispatch(importFetchedAccounts(response.data));
  467. dispatch(fetchFollowRequestsSuccess(response.data, next ? next.uri : null));
  468. }).catch(error => dispatch(fetchFollowRequestsFail(error)));
  469. };
  470. };
  471. export function fetchFollowRequestsRequest() {
  472. return {
  473. type: FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_REQUEST,
  474. };
  475. };
  476. export function fetchFollowRequestsSuccess(accounts, next) {
  477. return {
  478. type: FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_SUCCESS,
  479. accounts,
  480. next,
  481. };
  482. };
  483. export function fetchFollowRequestsFail(error) {
  484. return {
  485. type: FOLLOW_REQUESTS_FETCH_FAIL,
  486. error,
  487. };
  488. };
  489. export function expandFollowRequests() {
  490. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  491. const url = getState().getIn(['user_lists', 'follow_requests', 'next']);
  492. if (url === null) {
  493. return;
  494. }
  495. dispatch(expandFollowRequestsRequest());
  496. api(getState).get(url).then(response => {
  497. const next = getLinks(response).refs.find(link => link.rel === 'next');
  498. dispatch(importFetchedAccounts(response.data));
  499. dispatch(expandFollowRequestsSuccess(response.data, next ? next.uri : null));
  500. }).catch(error => dispatch(expandFollowRequestsFail(error)));
  501. };
  502. };
  503. export function expandFollowRequestsRequest() {
  504. return {
  505. type: FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_REQUEST,
  506. };
  507. };
  508. export function expandFollowRequestsSuccess(accounts, next) {
  509. return {
  510. type: FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_SUCCESS,
  511. accounts,
  512. next,
  513. };
  514. };
  515. export function expandFollowRequestsFail(error) {
  516. return {
  517. type: FOLLOW_REQUESTS_EXPAND_FAIL,
  518. error,
  519. };
  520. };
  521. export function authorizeFollowRequest(id) {
  522. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  523. dispatch(authorizeFollowRequestRequest(id));
  524. api(getState)
  525. .post(`/api/v1/follow_requests/${id}/authorize`)
  526. .then(() => dispatch(authorizeFollowRequestSuccess(id)))
  527. .catch(error => dispatch(authorizeFollowRequestFail(id, error)));
  528. };
  529. };
  530. export function authorizeFollowRequestRequest(id) {
  531. return {
  532. type: FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_REQUEST,
  533. id,
  534. };
  535. };
  536. export function authorizeFollowRequestSuccess(id) {
  537. return {
  538. type: FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_SUCCESS,
  539. id,
  540. };
  541. };
  542. export function authorizeFollowRequestFail(id, error) {
  543. return {
  544. type: FOLLOW_REQUEST_AUTHORIZE_FAIL,
  545. id,
  546. error,
  547. };
  548. };
  549. export function rejectFollowRequest(id) {
  550. return (dispatch, getState) => {
  551. dispatch(rejectFollowRequestRequest(id));
  552. api(getState)
  553. .post(`/api/v1/follow_requests/${id}/reject`)
  554. .then(() => dispatch(rejectFollowRequestSuccess(id)))
  555. .catch(error => dispatch(rejectFollowRequestFail(id, error)));
  556. };
  557. };
  558. export function rejectFollowRequestRequest(id) {
  559. return {
  560. type: FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_REQUEST,
  561. id,
  562. };
  563. };
  564. export function rejectFollowRequestSuccess(id) {
  565. return {
  566. type: FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_SUCCESS,
  567. id,
  568. };
  569. };
  570. export function rejectFollowRequestFail(id, error) {
  571. return {
  572. type: FOLLOW_REQUEST_REJECT_FAIL,
  573. id,
  574. error,
  575. };
  576. };